Isn’t activity based costing a form of absorbing variable overheads? (because in ABC, we decide on the reason we are incurring these overheads for example the no. of deliveries received and I believe we can only decide on a reason for incurring overheads costs if they are variable overheads) so how does it say in the explanation of answer 2 that ABC doesn’t avoid over or under absorption of fixed overheads BECAUSE it’s a form of absorption costing and therefore involves apportionment? isn’t this reasoning wrong?
mannannagpal says
Isn’t activity based costing a form of absorbing variable overheads? (because in ABC, we decide on the reason we are incurring these overheads for example the no. of deliveries received and I believe we can only decide on a reason for incurring overheads costs if they are variable overheads) so how does it say in the explanation of answer 2 that ABC doesn’t avoid over or under absorption of fixed overheads BECAUSE it’s a form of absorption costing and therefore involves apportionment? isn’t this reasoning wrong?
Sahaijsjsjaioafnn says
I got 80%. Thanks opentuition.?