#### Risk and Uncertainty: Please note that this lecture relates to Chapter 10 of the Course Notes (not chapter 9 as stated in the lecture). The example covered is on page 46 of the Course Notes.

View all free ACCA F5 lectures >> | This lecture is based on ACCA F5 course notes, download or view on line here >> |

Maryam says

Dear John!

You are simply the best! I rest my case!

Tyler says

Sir, for the par b (i) Expected values, why are we taking the profit of the the contract as well and multiplying it by a probability which is for the demand only?

John Moffat says

Because each of the profits results from each of the different demands.

So the probability of getting each of the profits will be the same as the probability of each of the demands.

Macha says

I had the same question. Thank you very much.

Xiaowen says

Hello Prof Moffat,

i have a bit trouble understanding when we were calculating the expected value, for example, contract 300, if we are sure of this 300 units, why we calculated by 2900*0.2, rather 900+2000*0.2, since it’s the 400 units that are uncertain.

Thanks!

Xiaowen says

just saw the below comment, and did a quick cal for

method in the video : 2900*0.2 +3400*0.3+4400*0.4+5400*0.1 = 4000

however, 400*5*0.2 + 500*5*0.3+700*5*0.4+900*5*0.1 +300*3 = 3900

get more confused……

Xiaowen says

Figured out the problem. it was the math in the video that got a problem. should be 3900. Thanks for the nice lecture!

eniola03 says

Hello John,Thank you very much for your video

It is really helpful but I want to verify on what you said about the possible profit.,you said we shouldn’t calculate all the profit in the exam as it might take our time in the exam. but what if the marks are allocated according to all the possible profit calculated or It doesn’t matter and Like how many do you think we should calculate in the exam?

John Moffat says

You misunderstood me

You should calculate all possible profits. What I said was that since the same arithmetic keeps repeating, there is no need to spend time showing the workings for all of them (if you can calculate them straight on your calculator).

Show workings for a few of them (to prove you know what you are doing) but you don’t need to show the workings for all to them (unless you need workings for your own benefit).

Sherif says

Dear Mick thank you for your help ,

can you advice which is the best calculators are suitable for acca? is caiso FC-200v suitable ?

thank you

John Moffat says

Who is Mick? There is no Mick working for me on OpenTuition!

Any scientific calculator will do – the casio FC-200 is fine.

The only functions that you need for F5 are log, x^n, and n’th root.

(the same applies for later exams, so you won’t need to by another calculator later If you decide to take P4 then you will need a button with ‘e’ on it, but if it has the above functions then it will certainly have ‘e’ as well!!)

John Moffat says

I am please that you are now all sorted

ammarsiraj says

A very nice explanation, thankyou.

marf111 says

Hello, first of all thank you for the lectures, they are very helpful.

I only have one question. At b) shouldn’t we add both:

– the expected profit from the ordinary demand

and

– the profit generated by the contract with the special customer

to get a total resulting profit?

I.e. for a contract of 800 we get an expected value from ordinary demand as you calculated, of $4,400, and a profit from contract of 800×3 = 2,400, so a total of 6800 (which looks the highest).

Thank you.

John Moffat says

No.

The profits calculated in (a) for all possibilities already include both the profits from ordinary demand and profits from the contract sales. (And don’t forget anyway that the total production is limited which means that in many of the cases the normal demand cannot be met in full)

mehreenkhan says

Hi i was having problems as to how we work out these payoff table numbers.

and thanks to this lecture.. I know am clear..

Thanks Sir !

farah says

i want to know how to calculate conteibution in risk and uncertainity question

John Moffat says

Contribution is the selling price less the variable costs.

If you are meaning the question in our Course Notes, then the contribution per unit for ‘normal’ sales is $5 (11 – 6), and for ‘contract’ sales is $3 (9 – 6).

The workings to get the total contribution for each possible outcome are shown in the lecture.

babykim says

In contract 300

3400*.0.3 =1020??????

John Moffat says

I am not clear as to what your question is.

3400 x 0.3 = 1020

Yes! So?

Nakita says

Hello John,

I think what she/he meant is that there was an error in your calculation during the lecture, when the expected value of the contract for 300 was being done.

Your calculation= $3,400 x 0.3= $ 1120

babykim says

thanks Nakita….:) thats exactly what I meant ….

John Moffat says

Sorry – it was a mistake. (Nobody is perfect Anyway it would only lose me half a mark)

The answer at the back of the Course Notes is correct, and so I am not going to re-record the lecture.

babykim says

hi john

The intention wasn’t to show you up , …. This is a paper that I am struggling with and just want to ensure that I maximize the best possible options to help me get through . So please don t get offensive if i question an answer that looks a bit odd …. I enjoy your lecture s and just want to ensure after listening to it that I am 100% confident to go on to practice questions….. nb I actually find your presentation style way better than my present lecturer

John Moffat says

Hey – don’t worry

I am not offended – thanks for pointing out the mistake.

Joseph says

@admin

thanks so much to opentuition for this kindness. my only and most worrying problem has to do with the constant break in connection. i would be more thankful if there should be any way these videos could be downloaded.

John Moffat says

I am sorry, but the break in connection is due to the internet at your end.

The videos are not downloadable – this is the only way that we can keep this site free of charge.

ekadoro says

Hello, I have one question: when we calculate expected value why do we multiply the whole profit by the probability? I mean, we are only unsure of the demand value, not the contract which is certain.

John Moffat says

You must always calculate the expected proft. I am guessing that you just want to calculate the expected deman (in units) but this will not give you the right answer (except by coincidence). (If you don\t believe me try some extreme values and see what happens – fo example a profit of 100 from the contact units and $1 per unit from normal demand )

ekadoro says

Thank you for your answer. I just realized that my question was a bit silly as the results will be the same. What I was trying to understand was why we multiply the total profit (both from the contract and normal demand) by the probability, why not multiply profits from normal demand and just add the profit from the contract after that to get the expected value (cause profits from demand is uncertain and profits from contract is certain):

For the contract size 500:

400*5*0.2=400

500*5*0.3=750

700*5*0.4=1400

700*5*0.1=350

So the expected value for the contract size 500 will be 400+750+1400+350+1500(contract profit 500*3) =4400.

The answer is the same cause the probability for the contract is 1.

Sorry just needed to get to math and common sense inline)))

John Moffat says

Oh thats no problem – it will give the same answer and so that is fine

acca2050 says

Is John Moffat is teaching this…I think its not his accent and he teaches extremely brilliantly. Please let me know I am worried.

Many Thanks

John Moffat says

It is me teaching it! Sorry if my accent sounds different

No way says

I do have had the same problem as ekadoro did. So for the sake of understanding thoroughly: Can you explain why we multiply the total profit (both from the contract and normal demand) by the probability, Mr Moffat?

I do know that it may easier for you to display the calculations. But that does not show the logic behind of the probability(or still I dont understand the way you think abt probability in this question).

Thanks in adv.

John Moffat says

Here is a simple example to illustrate the idea of expected values.

Suppose the profit per day was 100 with probability of 0.1 and 200 with probability of 0.9.

Effectively it would mean that out of every 10 days, 1 day would give 100 and 9 days would give 200.

So what is the average profit per day? If you add up the profit over 10 days (1 at 100 and 9 at 200) you get 1900. Divide by 10 and you get an average of 190 per day.

Easier is just to multiply by the probabilities and add up:

(100 x 0.1) + (200 + 0.9) = 190.

In this question we need to know the average total profit, so we calculate all the total profits that can occur and then multiply by probabilities to get the average.

No way says

“why not multiply profits from normal demand and just add the profit from the contract after that to get the expected value (cause profits from demand is uncertain and profits from contract is certain)”. That’s what I dont understand.

For the contract size 500:

400*5*0.2=400

500*5*0.3=750

700*5*0.4=1400

700*5*0.1=350

So the expected value for the contract size 500 will be 400+750+1400+350+1500(contract profit 500*3) =4400.

But you did:

500units = (0.2x 3,500)+(0.3×4,000)+(0.5×5,000)=4,400

0.2 or 0.3 are probability of the demand not the contract. So why do u multiply the probability with all the profit(in fact they-the probabilities- are just belong to the original demand and the probability for the contract is 1 or certainty). Why do you come to that way of thinking? Or you do that just because you think that makes your calculation easier? I know that is the same result but It makes me confuse the way you calculate.

Like ekadoro, I just needed to get to math and common sense inline.

Hope you clarify my confusing,

Thank you very much, Mr Moffat.

John Moffat says

@Duong:

You could certainly do what you have written and get the same answer if all the was required was the expected value.

However, part (a) specifically asks for all possible profits that could result (and almost always that is part (a) when it is asked in the exam).

My table does show all possible total profits, but your workings do not show each possible total profit, and so you would lose marks even though you have got the correct expected values.

No way says

Dear Mr John,

I totally agree the way you answer (a) question that means show all possible profits by contracting pay-off table.

At (b) expected profit question, I just have had one little confusion about the way you calculate.That’s all, everything else I absolutely agree with your approach. And If you dont mind can you show me why you do that?

Thank you John.

John Moffat says

OK. In part (a) we have a table showing all the possible total profits for each size of contract that we can choose.

The only reason that the profits differ for one particular contract size is that there are various levels of normal demand that can occur. We know the probability of each of these levels of normal demand, and therefore the probabilities of each of the different total profit are the same as the probabilities of the level of normal demand.

As you agreed earlier, you could get the expected profit a different way, but why do more work? We have set up the table of total profits in part (a) because it is required, so easiest is simply to work out the expected total profit using these figures.

No way says

I knew that we should take advantage the result from (a), but I had not had think that the probabilities of normal demand was the probabilities of total profit, so I didnot dare to calculate that way.

Everything is fine now.

Thank you for showing me, Mr John.

faizifaizi says

i have only one problem with other questions..is which amounts i should take on which side..i mean which amounts on the side and which amounts on the top????

John Moffat says

It doesn’t matter which way round you show the table. All the matters is that can calculate the correct profits and make the right decisions.

faizifaizi says

thanks sir for the quick reply…and i have one other confusion..in the part 2 of this lecture ..for maximax and maximin you were taking the profits horizontally but for the regret table you took the profits vertically why is that????

John Moffat says

We are doing two different things.

With maximax and maximin we are simply finding the maximum or minimum profit that can be made from each of the choices available to us.

With minimax regret, we are not basing the decision on the profits that we make, but on the potential profit that we will be losing if we have made the wrong decision.

So….to produce the regret table by calculating for each possible outcome how much potential profit we would have lost by making each of the possible choices (the difference between the profit we could have made if we had made the best decision and the profit we would actually have made). Then we effectively take a maximin type approach but on the regret table.

It is a hard thing to explain in words, but I do suggest you watch the part of the lecture again where I go through a very tiny example to explain the logic (and then I apply the same logic to the full question).

faizifaizi says

thanks again for reply sir…i got it i watched the lecture and now i m able to solve the questions….thanks very much..you are the best teacher of f5.. thanks again..