November 21, 2010 at 3:17 pm
On the list for exams tips for Dec’10 it says “8 typical question 8” – what does this mean please?
MamapepeNovember 22, 2010 at 4:48 pm
Any question on the syllabus.It may be fraudulent behaviourNovember 22, 2010 at 7:28 pm
Thanks for the reply Yaseerd. What makes you reference fraudulent behaviour over any other part of the syllabus?
MamapepeNovember 23, 2010 at 10:36 am
Do you know if there are any tips for the Irish Law exam?November 23, 2010 at 5:23 pm
I have been studying with Kaplan and they have put some questions in the mock paper about fraudulent behaviour and money laundering. I think they look over past exams to see what areas have not been in recent papers or what haven’t been tested on before. Only a guess so don’t quote me!November 23, 2010 at 9:48 pm
A typical q 8 is a scenario, based on contract law, and often involving invitation, offer, counter offer, option period ( maybe postal acceptance ) acceptance received too late, goods sold before the option period expires, ( possibly breach )
there are loads of scenario qs in the rev kit ( Ann’s gallery, Astrides wall, Ali (? ) ) in fact, in the first 30 or so questions based on contract law, all the “long” questions are previous questions 8 and after you’ve read 3 or 4 of them, you’ll get into the swing of understanding exactly what I mean when I say “typical question 8”!!November 24, 2010 at 4:42 pm
Hi – do the numbers next to the potential question subjects relate to questions in the exam kit and if so, which exam kit is it (I have Kaplan!)November 24, 2010 at 6:26 pm
Sorry, no! They relate to the questions in the BPP revision kit. I do not have a Kaplan kit, so I cannot give you the equivalent number – sorry.November 30, 2010 at 9:03 am
hi may someone please help.can the rule in foss v harbottle be applied to the doctrine of privity?it state that the shareholders can not sue on behalf of the company but rather the wronged party who is the company is the one to sue therefore i want to know if it can be applied againg on the doctrine of privityNovember 30, 2010 at 11:09 am
Y e s , i t c o u l d. But this is more applicable to the protection of minority interests ( small shareholders in a company ) and minority protection is no longer in your syllabus
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.