Paper F4 Dec 2010 exam was

Home Forums ACCA Forum F4 Corporate and Business Law Forums Paper F4 Dec 2010 exam was

This topic contains 126 replies, has 72 voices, and was last updated by avatar choonfah87 3 years, 6 months ago. This post has been viewed 404 times

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 127 total)
  • Author
    Posts

  • Avatar of admin
    admin
    Participant
    • Topics: 246
    • Replies: 756

    Please share below with community your comments about F4 exam!

    Take our F4 exam survey >>

    Vote in our instant poll!


    Avatar of shadedrose
    shadedrose
    Participant
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 60

    It was easy but a little lame… I mean 10 mark question about Statutory Documents?
    And I’m going to lose marks in Question 9, about dividends… I didn’t cover that topic well, I think.

    Also, all the other important topics, insolvency, veil of corporation, etc could have been examined!

    Anyways, It was good.

    And yes… tutor’s guesses weren’t very good!


    Avatar of eski101
    eski101
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 2

    Whats the catch?? if i could have just picked the questions i wanted to be asked, i could not have done a better job!!!


    avatar
    Moiz
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 12

    still hope for the best mate!!!


    avatar
    morpher999
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 6

    Well. Think is was ok overall. Didn’t revise unfair dismissal but knew about remedy.

    Just some little precisions:

    Primary legislation = parliamentary legislation (or does that include case law as well?)
    Question 8, Was it about promissory estoppel or intentions to create legal relations. Not sure.

    For the last question, didn;t understand anything. i do know some of the means of partnership disolution but the financial effect of it, nope.

    Overall, i do believe it was a fair paper.


    Avatar of shadedrose
    shadedrose
    Participant
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 60

    I personally liked 10th question; connected the ‘order of distributing the proceeds of assets’ with partnership dissolution.

    My best question is going to be the 2nd one: about breach of contract.

    Question 8 was about Intention to Create legal relations. I also discussed the acceptance by conduct and revocation.


    avatar
    ali.hbc@gmail.com
    Participant
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 37

    Best of Luck to all….

    Paper was easy but i agree with shadedrose that how to get 10 marks in a short answer question.

    I slipped at Q2.


    Avatar of soulslayer
    soulslayer
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22

    Paper was ok..

    I did not like the 3 last question though…:S

    for question 8, was it on domestic agreement? whats your views on it guys?

    hmm the tips were not accurate at all..!!LOL


    Avatar of soulslayer
    soulslayer
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22

    Paper was ok..

    I did not like the 3 last question though…:S

    for question 8, was it on domestic agreement? whats your views on it guys?

    hmm the tips were not accurate at all..!!LOL


    Avatar of Shunmas
    Shunmas
    Participant
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 88

    50% was absolutely unimportant….especially the tort broken down into sections.

    Bonus and rights shares, i discussed them from accounting point of view (F7)

    Statutory documents…huh….how come a 10-marker….

    Amazed at David Kelly

    But hope for the best as i did the contract, legislation, intentions to create legal relations, directors duties, dismissal….pretty good

    Thanks


    Avatar of Shunmas
    Shunmas
    Participant
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 88

    Q8…i think it involved financial arrangements from a commercial sense….so there was a contract….Ben & Che have to pay


    Avatar of shadedrose
    shadedrose
    Participant
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 60

    Right, Shunmas… I discussed bonus and rights from the general knowledge I had about them. What was the first part, though? pre- something rights?


    avatar
    sizzlin89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3

    will someone tell me what was question 8 related to?? i wrote about intentions and a bit of unilateral offer..wen i came out of the hall a friend told me they were askng about suffiency of consideration??? wat was it related to…


    avatar
    sizzlin89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3

    shadedrose its was pre emptio right and its right of SH to b asked 1st wen issuing new shres tht is wen new shres r offered they shud b asked if they wnt 2 buy 1st..


    Avatar of ansi
    ansi
    Moderator
    • Topics: 88
    • Replies: 809

    Attempted F4 Global ..

    well it was definately okay , a bit unsure about two last scenarios , but in general i believe it’s gonna be a pass.
    Was amazed about tips , specially those from EXP , i didn’t expect so many coincidences. However , relied on them, and it was a right choice :)


    avatar
    Anonymous
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1

    what was principle of neighbor?


    avatar
    Anonymous
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1

    what vas de ans for tht 2 mark question in tort? economic liability


    avatar
    Anonymous
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 3

    I THINK THE EXAMINER FORGET THE FORMAT OF THE PAPER…


    avatar
    dianaa
    Participant
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 8

    hi
    does anyone know how strict they are?

    I have attempted all questions, well but not perfect…
    now realised that misunderstand the subject with arbitration panel..

    fisrt time i attended the exam i got 3 points and i dod not know almost anything :)…now i have learned and mistaken…ufffff


    Avatar of soulslayer
    soulslayer
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22

    @saaag said:
    what was principle of neighbor?

    I think we had to mainly refer to Stevenson’s case and also talk a little about neibour by proximity…

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 127 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.