Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA LW Exams › Doubt?
- This topic has 11 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by MikeLittle.
- AuthorPosts
- July 20, 2015 at 5:30 pm #261168
What do u mean by SC binds all English courts,but not itself
and CA Bound by ECJ, SC and itselfI dont understand the term itself in both cases?
July 20, 2015 at 5:56 pm #261169SC is Supreme Court
CA is Court of Appeal
ECJ is European Court of Justice
(Are these not referred to in the notes immediately above?)
July 20, 2015 at 6:38 pm #261171What is the difference between something binds something and not itself
and something bound by something and itself?
both the same meaning?sI dont understand your reply?
July 20, 2015 at 8:45 pm #261184Imagine a vertical hierarchical structure with ECJ at the top, SC next underneath and CA below that.
When SC makes a decision, that decision is binding on all lower courts including AC but is not binding on judges hearing subsequent cases at SC level (so binds all English courts but not itself)
CA is bound by ECJ and by SC and by decisions made in previous cases by judges in cases heard by the Court of Appeal (so bound by ECJ, SC and itself)
Better?
July 21, 2015 at 9:54 am #261228yeah.. Whats AC?
July 21, 2015 at 4:50 pm #261298Same as CA – Court of Appeal / Appeal Court
Sorry – that wasn’t clear
July 21, 2015 at 5:02 pm #261303thnk U 🙂
July 21, 2015 at 5:56 pm #261326You’re welcome
July 25, 2015 at 6:58 pm #261962Can u explain me whats repudiatory breach is?
July 25, 2015 at 7:50 pm #261980Repudiatory breach refers to the breach of a term in a contract that is sufficiently serious to justify treating the contract as terminated.
A breach of a term that is a condition is an example of a repudiation breach
Ok?
July 26, 2015 at 8:37 am #262101okay understood its more of a vital term in the contract so sufficiently serious to justify treating the contract as terminated…
July 26, 2015 at 5:10 pm #262260Rather than a term that is merely treated as a breach of warranty ie it doesn’t go to the root of the contract.
Look at the cases (1) Poussard v Spiers & Pond and (2) Bettini v Gye for illustrative examples
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.