Comments

  1. avatar says

    Hi,

    I am currently reviewing past papers and have come across an area where the answer is calculated differently to this lecture. (Paper June 2012, Question 1, Note 2)

    Here the re-measurement ($3M) of FV @ DOA was recognised as part of the GW calculation and not expensed through P&L as the $600,000 in this lecture.

    is this because:

    In this example the 600k relates to contingent consideration and the question in the past paper relates to FV adjustment?

    or because

    The re-meassurment was in the same accounting period as acquisition in the past paper but was in a later accounting period in this example?

      • avatar says

        laptop and not sure what you mean by try google chrome, think this has unbuntu on and mozilla firefox , other lectures seem to run fine just the last two for this section come up with this error. I have moved onto the next chapter, but would be nice to have access to these two,
        appreciate your help!

      • Profile photo of admin says

        This lecture works fine
        Not sure why this lecture fail on your laptop

        Google chrome is another browser..
        Maybe it would help if you install it

  2. Profile photo of rooman says

    As sound quality was low at last moments…need to confirm that from april 2009 onwards …subsidiary can be excluded only on grounds of immateriality and when “held for sale”……….??????????

Leave a Reply