ACCA F5 Activity based costing Example 1 part 2

View all free ACCA F5 lectures >> This lecture is based on OpenTuition F5 course notes

Comments

  1. Well done Lecturer, good source especially for people like me who find it difficult to get Tuition providers nearby.

  2. greeat lecture, God bless.

  3. Thank You… Great lecture…..

  4. Thank you my lecturer….Hopefully I will pass this paper in June.

  5. nice

  6. Thanks, very helpful & great service.
    keep it up

  7. very helpful, thanksssssssssssssssss!

  8. Your teaching is fantastic,pls am not clear on the ABC on machine hour. What criterial is used in getting 2 each used for the cost driver instead of the 2,12 and 2 that was given as the
    machine hr/u’

  9. i got much more things in your lecture which i did not get in class, thanks a lot, so much happy with your lecture.

  10. useful

  11. Thanks a lot its helpful :)

  12. please in an exams setting can I show all my workings?

  13. Hi John,
    As ever, great lecture.

    Quick question: in both cases 190k were absorbed, but the costs are wildly different.
    If I add up the overheads per unit, example a) gives me 20.68+17.84+17.84 = $56.36, and example b) gives me 18.90+18.79+23.63 = $61.32.
    That then also means that the profits don’t balance. I would expect the profits per unit to be different, but that when added up they’d be the same. After all, we’ve spent the same amount, and we’ve charged the same amount (in this case there hasn’t been any over/under absorption to confuse matters).

    Thank you
    Andreas

    • @andreasmacfarlane, You cannot add them up per unit. But if you multiply by the number of units produced, and then add up the totals, the total overheads will be the same in both cases :-)

      • @johnmoffat, Thanks John.
        I had done that to confirm that it comes back to 190k, but still can’t work out why it then is different per unit.
        It’s still the same value of direct cost, and the same value of overheads spread over the same number of units. What’s causing the difference?

        Surely if you’re after bigger profits you’d then just use the first approach.
        Or is it because of rounding errors along the way that the differences are more accentuated at the individual unit level than at the total inventory level?

        Thank you

        • @andreasmacfarlane, A few things…..

          Firstly, there is no logic in adding the unit costs together. Suppose apples cost $2 each and oranges cost $3 each. The total is $5 for one of each, but that means nothing to anyone – if you buy 100 apples and 1 orange, then $5 is completely irrelevant :)

          Secondly, we can charge the overheads between the products in any way we want – for example, we could simply divide the total overheads by the total number of units produced – there is no ‘law’. What makes ABC such a good idea is that we are trying to charge them according to how much of each overhead each product is using.

          Thirdly, the total profit of the business will be the same however we charge the overheads. The total overhead cost in the income statement will be 190,000 whatever happens and so the profit will not be affected. The reason we want to charge the overheads to products in a ‘fair’ way is because if we know how much it costs to make one unit we can then decide how much to charge. If one product costs a lot to make then we obviously want to charge a high price. (And of course changing the selling price will effect the profit)

  14. Very helpful, thanks!

  15. Thanks ,

  16. kindly help please, i am unable to fully load the video and then disconnect to Internet and view the entire lecture.there’s no telephone line installation and so i used a usb emtel internet key….please help thank you

  17. thanks

  18. very good

  19. Really nice, i would even say interactive. Makes you think, good pace, clear english. Like it very much

  20. this is beautiful,am so happy anout this

  21. enjoyed the presentation well done

  22. its wonderful to listen to these lectures.keep it up

  23. Im glad im here…thanks a million open tuition

  24. Awesome………………………………….

  25. Thanks a lot. The lecture was really good.

  26. its fantastic lecture to do the perfect study and i would like to know that is it possible to provide that kind of video lecture in other subject .for example f1

  27. nice 1

  28. thank u so much for such a wonderful lecture
    kindly plz tell me the avg marks this example covers in exams

  29. great lecture

  30. A job well done. Thanks

  31. Great Job….very very well done….

  32. I am loving it!!!!

  33. Great lecture. well explained. Really grateful for the useful little exam tips the lecturer gives.

  34. Great lecture, clearly explained and easy to listen to

  35. whats problem with them why bot stand at one place do they have stomach problem loll
    they get away from microphone and cause very diviation

  36. Great job.God bless

  37. awesome….

  38. i love this, one of the best i have seen in recent times. is there a way i can get a video copy.
    thank you

  39. i must say that i realy like this lecture. perfect job done by OpenTuition. Thanks a lot.

  40. Yeah. He makes a lot of sense. Great job!

  41. Best method for teaching. Awesome. Its like student is sitting in classroom and also the tutor is very very good.giving good examples in between letures.
    Thank you open tuition

Leave a Comment